Point of view Wikipedia:Manual of Style
quotation should used, attribution, present emotive opinions cannot expressed in wikipedia s own voice, never present cultural norms opinional:
acceptable: siskel , ebert called film unforgettable .
unacceptable: site considered sacred religion s scriptures.
concise opinions not overly emotive can reported attribution instead of direct quotation. use of quotation marks around simple descriptive terms can seem imply doubtful regarding material being quoted; sarcasm or weasel words, supposedly or so-called , might inferred.
permissible: siskel , ebert called film interesting.
unnecessary , may imply doubt: siskel , ebert called film interesting .
should quoted: siskel , ebert called film interesting heart-wrenching .
Comments
Post a Comment